ACACIA
PharmaACACIA is a pharmaceutical company focused on Oncology. Key products include BARHEMSYS.
ACACIA at a Glance
- Strong track record with 95% execution quality across 17 trials
- Fast trial execution (7 months median completion)
Key Drugs
Top revenue-generating and strategically important drugs approved in the last 15 years. These represent the company's core commercial portfolio.
Recent FDA Approvals
New drug approvals (NDA/BLA) in the last 2 years. Shows novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.
Therapeutic Areas
Disease areas where this company has approved drugs and active pipeline. Weighted by commercial stage: approved drugs count most, followed by late-stage trials.
Top Competitors
Companies with the most overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets. Based on approved drugs and pipeline focus.
Pipeline Snapshot
Active clinical trials across all therapeutic areas. Data from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Phase 3 Readout Calendar Pro
2 Phase 3 trials with confidence-graded primary completion dates.
Anchored on CT.gov primary completion date. Topline announcements typically precede this by 3–9 months. Confidence labels combine date type (ACTUAL/ESTIMATED) with last-update freshness.
Pro Intelligence Preview
Deep insights for investors and analysts
Revenue Insights
- • BARHEMSYS leads revenue
- • 2 key drugs tracked
Patent Risk
- • Patent expiration timeline
- • Revenue at risk analysis
Compare Companies
- • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
- • Revenue & market share comparison
Execution Intelligence
- • Phase 3: 5/5 completed
- • Speed: 7 months avg
Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling
How We Calculate These Metrics
Execution Quality Score
Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.
What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.
- Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
- Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
- Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
- Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges