TheraRadar
← Back
Data updated: Nov 8, 2026

Eli Lilly

LLY Big Pharma
MetabolicOncologyImmunology Execution: Good

Indianapolis-based pharma with leading positions in diabetes (Mounjaro, Trulicity) and Alzheimer's (Donanemab). Fast-growing obesity franchise with Zepbound.

$41.3B
Revenue (2024)
$750.0B
Market Cap
-
Trials
3
New Drugs (2yr)
Modality:
16 Small Molecules 24 Biologics

FDA Novel Drug Designations

(2016-2025)
12 Novel 2 First-in-Class 2 Orphan 3 Breakthrough 2 Accelerated 5 Priority Review 4 Fast Track
See 12 novel approvals →
2025 INLURIYO (IMLUNESTRANT TOSYLATE) Fast Track
2024 KISUNLA (DONANEMAB-AZBT) Breakthrough · Priority Review · Fast Track
2024 EBGLYSS (LEBRIKIZUMAB-LBKZ) Fast Track
2023 OMVOH (MIRIKIZUMAB-MRKZ)
2022 MOUNJARO (TIRZEPATIDE) First-in-Class
2020 RETEVMO (SELPERCATINIB) Orphan · Breakthrough · Priority Review · Accelerated
2019 REYVOW (LASMIDITAN SUCCINATE) First-in-Class
2018 EMGALITY (GALCANEZUMAB-GNLM) Priority Review
2018 OLUMIANT (BARICITINIB)
2017 VERZENIO (ABEMACICLIB) Priority Review · Fast Track
2016 TALTZ (IXEKIZUMAB)
2016 LARTRUVO (OLARATUMAB) Orphan · Breakthrough · Priority Review · Accelerated

Eli Lilly at a Glance

  • Leading 16 drug targets across portfolio
  • Fast trial execution (15 months median completion)

Upcoming FDA Decisions

Full Calendar →
Jan 20, 2027 — Foundayo (orforglipron)

Eli Lilly's Therapeutic Areas

Eli Lilly's approved drugs and pipeline span 5 therapeutic areas, led by Metabolic and Oncology, across 24 biologic and 16 small-molecule drugs. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.

Metabolic 40%
16 drugs Phase 3: 135 Phase 2: 52 Phase 1: 165
Oncology 26%
7 drugs Phase 3: 40 Phase 2: 107 Phase 1: 166
Immunology 18%
3 drugs Phase 3: 68 Phase 2: 41 Phase 1: 27
Neurology 11%
3 drugs Phase 3: 36 Phase 2: 22 Phase 1: 33
Dermatology 6%
3 drugs Phase 3: 24 Phase 2: 7 Phase 1: 6

Eli Lilly's Top Competitors

Eli Lilly's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Pfizer, Roche, and AbbVie. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.

Eli Lilly Pipeline Snapshot

Eli Lilly has 929 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 303 Phase 3, 229 Phase 2 and 397 Phase 1.

303
Phase 3
229
Phase 2
397
Phase 1

Phase 3 Readout Calendar Pro

8 Phase 3 trials with confidence-graded primary completion dates.

Full calendar →
Q4 2026
Tirzepatide
Type 1 Diabetes
Estimated · aging NCT06914895
Q4 2026
Tirzepatide
Type 1 Diabetes
Estimated · aging NCT06962280
Q4 2026
Orforglipron
OSA
Estimated · stale NCT06649045
Unlock 5 more readouts with confidence-graded estimates
Upgrade to Pro

Anchored on CT.gov primary completion date. Topline announcements typically precede this by 3–9 months. Confidence labels combine date type (ACTUAL/ESTIMATED) with last-update freshness.

Pro Intelligence Preview

Deep insights for investors and analysts

Revenue Insights

  • • MOUNJARO leads revenue
  • • 5 key drugs tracked
View revenue breakdown →

Trial Catalysts

  • • Metabolic pipeline focus
  • • 8 Phase 3 readouts tracked
View readout calendar →

Patent Risk

  • • Patent expiration timeline
  • • Revenue at risk analysis
View patent timeline →

Compare Companies

  • • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
  • • Revenue & market share comparison
Compare with competitor →

Execution Intelligence

  • • Phase 3: 242/364 completed
  • • Speed: 15 months avg
Unlock Full Intelligence

Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling

How We Calculate These Metrics

Execution Quality Score

Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.

What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.

  • Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
  • Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
  • Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
  • Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges