LEO LABS
PharmaLEO LABS is a pharmaceutical company focused on Immunology, Dermatology, Oncology. Key products include PICATO.
LEO LABS at a Glance
- Strong track record with 90% execution quality across 172 trials
- Fast trial execution (9 months median completion)
LEO LABS's Key Drugs
LEO LABS's key approved drugs from the last 15 years (excludes generics, biosimilars and IV formulations).
LEO LABS's Recent FDA Approvals
New NDA/BLA approvals for LEO LABS over the last two years — novel drugs only, excluding generics and label supplements.
LEO LABS's Therapeutic Areas
LEO LABS's approved drugs and pipeline span 4 therapeutic areas, led by Immunology and Dermatology, across 0 biologic and 1 small-molecule drug. Weighted by commercial stage — approved drugs count most, then late-stage trials.
LEO LABS's Top Competitors
LEO LABS's closest competitors by therapeutic-area and drug-target overlap include Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Johnson & Johnson. Ranked by overlap in therapeutic areas and drug targets across approved drugs and pipeline.
LEO LABS Pipeline Snapshot
LEO LABS has 113 active clinical programs from ClinicalTrials.gov — 33 Phase 3, 36 Phase 2 and 44 Phase 1.
Pro Intelligence Preview
Deep insights for investors and analysts
Revenue Insights
- • Top drug revenue breakdown
- • Drug-level revenue analysis
Trial Catalysts
- • Immunology pipeline focus
- • Phase 3 readout tracking
Patent Risk
- • Patent expiration timeline
- • Revenue at risk analysis
Compare Companies
- • Side-by-side pipeline analysis
- • Revenue & market share comparison
Execution Intelligence
- • Phase 3: 39/44 completed
- • Speed: 9 months avg
Revenue forecasts • Trial milestones • Patent risk modeling
Active (0)
Discontinued (1)
Company Info
- First Approval
- 1989-12-28
- Latest
- 2021-03-19
- Applications
- 3
How We Calculate These Metrics
Execution Quality Score
Measures trial completion rates weighted by phase importance. Phase 3 trials count 4x more than Phase 1 because late-stage completion is harder and more valuable.
What counts as "completed": A trial that reached its planned endpoint and reported results. Trials that were terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted as completed—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.
- Excellent (80%+): Top-tier execution, most trials reach planned endpoints
- Good (60-79%): Strong execution with occasional early terminations
- Fair (40-59%): Average execution, notable rate of terminated/withdrawn trials
- Needs Improvement (under 40%): High termination rates, execution challenges