TheraRadar
← All Targets

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors

6 drugs
Oncology
Target Attractiveness: Highly Attractive (83%)

About Topoisomerase I

Topoisomerase I (TOP1) is an enzyme that relieves torsional stress during DNA replication and transcription by cutting and rejoining single DNA strands. Inhibiting TOP1 disrupts DNA metabolism, especially in rapidly dividing cells, making it a target for oncology drugs.

Strategic Insights

ℹ️ How we calculate
  • Validated target with strong trial activity and 83% attractiveness score.
6
Approved Drugs
6
Companies
12
Indications
1
Therapeutic Areas
Broadest Approval
ENHERTU
DAIICHI SANKYO
5
approved indications

Human Genetic Evidence Moderate

Genetic Verdict
⚠️ MODERATE SUPPORT
Clinical Translation
~1.3x
vs baseline success
Direction
❓ Unknown
Confidence
Low (0% consistent)

Top Drugs

ENHERTU
DAIICHI SANKYO
5 indications · 2019
IRINOTECAN HYDROCHLORIDE
Teva
2 indications · 2008
TRODELVY
IMMUNOMEDICS INC
2 indications · 2020
🏢

Six companies have approved drugs targeting Topoisomerase I, including QILU PHARM HAINAN and DAIICHI SANKYO.

Drug Modality Landscape

Modalities

Small molecule
3
50%
ADC
3
50%

Routes of Administration

💉 Injection
4
67%
💉 IV
1
17%
💊 Oral
1
17%
💡

Topoisomerase I is druggable by both biologics (3) and small molecules (3), indicating broad therapeutic accessibility.

Consider novel modalities to differentiate from existing Topoisomerase I-targeting therapies.

Oral option available Multiple modalities

📈 Modality Evolution

1996 Small molecule (HYCAMTIN)
2019 ADC (ENHERTU)

Small molecules pioneered Topoisomerase I targeting (1996), with adcs entering more recently (2019).

3 drugs pre-2015 3 drugs since 2015

Clinical Trials 1,282 trials

1,282
Total Trials
577
Active
499
Completed
71%
Completion Rate

Completion by Phase

Phase Total Completed Failed Active Completion
Phase 1 402 185 73 141 72%
Phase 2 606 218 111 272 66%
Phase 3 250 87 15 148 85%
Phase 4 24 9 1 13 90%

Top Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (N... 72 82%
Hoffmann-La Roche 50 89%
AstraZeneca 35 100%
Gilead Sciences 29 70%
Fudan University 24 100%
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center 23 43%
Daiichi Sankyo 21 63%
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC 20 62%

By Modality

Small molecule
1282 71%
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Completion rate = completed ÷ (completed + terminated + withdrawn)

Phase 3 Readout Calendar Pro

8 Phase 3 trials testing approved Topoisomerase I drugs across all sponsors.

Full calendar →
Q4 2026
Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy
Gilead Sciences · Metastatic Breast Cancer
Estimated · fresh NCT04639986
Q1 2027
Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy
Gilead Sciences · Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Estimated · aging NCT05382286
Q2 2028
Sacituzumab Govitecan-hziy
Gilead Sciences · Locally Advanced or Unresectable Metastatic Breast Cancer
Estimated · aging NCT05840211
Unlock 5 more readouts with confidence-graded estimates
Upgrade to Pro

Coverage: trials whose intervention is an approved drug targeting Topoisomerase I. Pre-approval candidates with development codes (e.g. AZD0901, MK-7240) are not yet linked. Anchored on CT.gov primary completion date.

Pro Intelligence Preview

Deep insights for drug target analysis

Competitive Landscape

  • 6 companies competing
  • Market share by company

Full Drug Portfolio

  • All 6 approved drugs
  • Approval dates & indications

Genetic Validation

  • Full genetic evidence table
  • Effect sizes & directions

Approval Timeline

  • Full 6-drug timeline
  • First-of-modality markers

Clinical Trials Analysis

  • Competition: High (15 sponsors)
  • Success rates by condition
Unlock Full Intelligence

Full summary • All drugs • Genetic evidence • Trials • Timeline

How We Calculate These Metrics

Target Attractiveness Score

A 0-100 score based on trial activity, sponsor diversity, and completion rates. Calculated from 871 clinical trials targeting Topoisomerase I.

Completion rate: Percentage of trials that reached their planned endpoint. Trials terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.

  • Highly Attractive (80+): High trial activity, many sponsors, strong completion rates
  • Attractive (60-79): Good trial activity and validation
  • Moderate (40-59): Moderate interest from sponsors
  • Low (under 40): Limited trial activity or validation concerns

Strategic Insights

Auto-generated insights based on trial analytics including competition intensity, white space opportunities, modality shifts, and failure patterns. We analyze trial sponsors, phases, indications, and outcomes.

Risk Signals

  • High Competition: Many sponsors competing for this target (may reduce market opportunity)
  • High Failure Risk: Low trial completion rates suggest development challenges
  • Low Validation: Limited trial activity or poor outcomes indicate uncertain viability
  • White Space Available: Underexplored indications present opportunities