VMAT2 Inhibitors
6 drugsAbout VMAT2
VMAT2 (Vesicular Monoamine Transporter 2) transports dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, and histamine into synaptic vesicles within the CNS. This packaging regulates neurotransmitter release and neuronal signaling, making it crucial for brain function.
VMAT2 is a strong therapeutic target with genetic support (max score 0.79) linking it to diseases like infantile dystonia-parkinsonism. Loss-of-function variants increase risk, suggesting activation strategies may be beneficial.
Six FDA-approved small molecule drugs target VMAT2, including AUSTEDO and INGREZZA, for CNS disorders. These drugs from Teva, NEUROCRINE, and BAUSCH highlight VMAT2's therapeutic potential.
Strategic Insights
ℹ️ How we calculate- White space opportunity in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder with only 1 trials.
Human Genetic Evidence Strong
VMAT2 has strong genetic support with a max score of 0.79 linking it to infantile dystonia-parkinsonism.
The strong genetic support suggests a higher probability of clinical success for VMAT2-targeting drugs.
💡 Why activation?
- • Loss-of-function variants increase disease risk (OR > 1) — restoring function may help
- • 100% directional consistency across 3 traits
- • Strong signal in nervous system disease, genetic, familial or congenital disease pathways
Cross-Disease Effects
Trade-off: LowDirection of Effect
100% alignedEvidence Across Diseases
9 totalGWAS and other genetic studies link SLC18A2 to 9 diseases.
Loss-of-function causes disease; activation may help
Loss-of-function causes disease; activation may help
🔗 Colocalization Evidence 1 strong
max H4: 0.92eQTL/pQTL signals for SLC18A2 colocalize with these GWAS traits, providing causal evidence that gene expression changes drive disease risk.
Understanding these scores
Association Score (0-1): Combines all evidence types (genetic, literature, drugs, animal models). Higher = more evidence linking target to disease. This is a ranking heuristic, not a confidence score.
L2G Score: Open Targets uses a machine learning model (Locus-to-Gene) to predict which gene is causal at each GWAS locus. L2G=0.5 means ~50% probability of being the causal gene. Only associations with L2G > 0.05 are included.
Odds Ratio (OR): From gene burden studies (UK Biobank, AstraZeneca PheWAS). Measures how loss-of-function variants affect disease risk. OR<1 = protective (inhibiting target may help), OR>1 = risk (losing function causes disease).
Beta (β): Effect size for continuous traits. β<0 = protective, β>0 = risk.
Clinical Translation (~1.8x): Based on Nelson et al. 2015: drug targets with genetic evidence have ~2x higher success rates in clinical trials. We estimate: Strong support (score ≥0.7) → ~1.8x, Moderate (0.3-0.7) → ~1.3x, Weak → baseline.
Colocalization (H4): Tests whether a GWAS signal and an eQTL/pQTL signal share the same causal variant. H4 is the posterior probability that both traits are associated AND share a causal variant. H4 > 0.8 = strong evidence that gene expression/protein levels drive disease risk. This links genetic variation → gene expression → disease, supporting the target-disease connection.
Top Drugs
Teva, NEUROCRINE, and BAUSCH are the key players in the VMAT2 drug market.
The concentrated market suggests high barriers to entry for new companies targeting VMAT2.
| Drug | Company | Approved | Indications |
|---|---|---|---|
| XENAZINE | BAUSCH | 2008 | 2 |
| INGREZZA | NEUROCRINE | 2017 | 2 |
| TETRABENAZINE | Teva | 2015 | 1 |
Drug Modality Landscape
Modalities
Routes of Administration
VMAT2 is amenable to small molecule drugs, with oral options available for convenient dosing.
Exploring alternative modalities like antibodies or gene therapies could provide a competitive advantage.
Clinical Trials 49 trials
Completion by Phase
| Phase | Total | Completed | Failed | Active | Completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 85% |
| Phase 2 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 75% |
| Phase 3 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 90% |
| Phase 4 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 86% |
Top Sponsors
By Modality
Top Conditions
Top Drugs
Drug Approval Timeline (2008 - 2024)
VMAT2 has seen approvals spanning 17 years, from 2008 (XENAZINE) to 2024 (INGREZZA SPRINKLE).
The recent approval of INGREZZA SPRINKLE suggests continued interest and potential in VMAT2-targeted therapies.
Pro Intelligence Preview
Deep insights for drug target analysis
Competitive Landscape
- • 3 companies competing
- • Market share by company
Full Drug Portfolio
- • All 6 approved drugs
- • Approval dates & indications
Genetic Validation
- • Full genetic evidence table
- • Effect sizes & directions
Approval Timeline
- • Full 6-drug timeline
- • First-of-modality markers
Clinical Trials Analysis
- • Competition: High (15 sponsors)
- • White space: 10 underexplored indications
- • Success rates by condition
Full summary • All drugs • Genetic evidence • Trials • Timeline
How We Calculate These Metrics
Target Attractiveness Score
A 0-100 score based on trial activity, sponsor diversity, and completion rates. Calculated from 37 clinical trials targeting VMAT2.
Completion rate: Percentage of trials that reached their planned endpoint. Trials terminated early, withdrawn, or suspended are not counted—these often indicate safety issues, lack of efficacy, or strategic pivots.
- Highly Attractive (80+): High trial activity, many sponsors, strong completion rates
- Attractive (60-79): Good trial activity and validation
- Moderate (40-59): Moderate interest from sponsors
- Low (under 40): Limited trial activity or validation concerns
Strategic Insights
Auto-generated insights based on trial analytics including competition intensity, white space opportunities, modality shifts, and failure patterns. We analyze trial sponsors, phases, indications, and outcomes.
Risk Signals
- High Competition: Many sponsors competing for this target (may reduce market opportunity)
- High Failure Risk: Low trial completion rates suggest development challenges
- Low Validation: Limited trial activity or poor outcomes indicate uncertain viability
- White Space Available: Underexplored indications present opportunities